'Krull': the science fantasy of 'Star Wars' without the magic

However, most of the wannabes ignored a crucial element of George Lucas’s extremely lucrative franchise – for all the spaceships, robots, and lasers, “Star Wars” was actually fantasy in sci-fi clothing, built around a hero whose quest revolved as much around magic (cleverly rebranded as “the Force”) as futuristic gadgets.

Luke Skywalker’s well publicized exploits on the Death Star were such a spectacular success that there was an air of inevitability when other Hollywood studios tried to make a “Star Wars” of their own. More remarkable was the fact that their subsequent efforts to milk the cash cow (or bantha, perhaps?) took such different approaches to outer space.

In the years following “A New Hope,” viewers were invited to experience the high camp of “Flash Gordon,” the overblown space opera of “The Black Hole,” and a Roger Corman-produced interstellar riff on “The Magnificent Seven” called “Battle Beyond the Stars.” “Star Trek” also got in on the act with the “2001: A Space Odyssey”-esque grandeur of “The Motion Picture,” while T.V. viewers were given a weekly dose of sci-fi in their homes courtesy of “Battlestar Galactica” (arguably one of the best sci-fi TV shows of all time).

That saber of light looks slightly familiar… (Image credit: Columbia Pictures)

Unlike most of its rivals, “Krull” pushed fantasy to the top of the mix. In fact, it effectively flipped the Lucas formula on its head, imagining a quasi-fairytale world where the minimal sci-fi quotient was fulfilled by some dodgy alien invaders. Indeed, if the producers had pitched the movie as “‘The Lord of the Rings’ with Stormtroopers instead of Orcs,” they wouldn’t have been far off the mark.

As it turned out, audiences either weren’t ready for Hollywood’s latest attempt to ride the “Star Wars” wave, or – more likely – simply not interested. “Krull” was a critical and commercial flop on its 1983 release, and even now, on its 40th anniversary, it’s hard to see exactly what the filmmakers were aiming for. Even so, if you can look past the over-earnest dialogue, the incoherent plotting, and the bizarre mishmash of genres, the movie still delivers its fair share of memorable moments. It even comes armed with a weapon worthy of a place alongside the best lightsabers in the arsenal of classic sci-fi ordnance.

The Black Fortress is home to the main antagonist, the Beast. (Image credit: Columbia Pictures)

Like “A New Hope,” “Krull” opens with a gigantic spacecraft flying over an unknown planet orbiting twin suns. This spacecraft is actually the Black Fortress, mobile base of operations for the all-conquering Beast who’s decided to make the planet of Krull (a name worthy of a prog rock album) his new home. We know this because elderly mentor figure Ynyr (Freddie Jones) has told us that “this, it was given me to know” in his preposterously portentous opening narration.

Then, as seamlessly as switching channels on your T.V.’s remote, the movie segues into territory more traditionally associated with a Disney cartoon. In a theme park-worthy fairytale castle, chosen ones Prince Colwyn (Ken Marshall) and Princess Lyssa (Lysette Anthony) declare their undying love for each other, safe in the knowledge they are not brother and sister. But this most tender of moments proves short-lived, as the Beast’s Slayers (anonymous soldiers wearing Stormtrooper-esque plastic armor) turn up to crash the party. As Colwyn’s human soldiers do their best to fight off laser weapons with swords, the skirmish is such a hideous mismatch that it’s no surprise when Lyssa is abducted to become the Beast’s reluctant bride.

A side-by-side movie poster comparison of sci-fi fantasy movie “Krull” (1983) and “Star Wars: Return of the Jedi” (1983). (Image credit: Columbia Pictures)

Tragedies like this are often the making of a fantasy hero so, with the help of Ynyr-Wan Kenobi, Colwyn sets off to rescue his fiancée. Along the way he shoves his hand into a pool of lava to recover the glaive (a magical, bladed boomerang) and then – although he possesses little visible charisma – persuades a shapeshifter, a Cyclops, a kid, and an army of hard-boiled mercenaries (Liam Neeson and Robbie Coltrane among them) to join his impossible quest.

Not a lot else about the movie stands up to scrutiny. Why is a herd of horses conveniently waiting for the band when they emerge from a particularly treacherous forest? How does Colwyn know how to use the glaive, despite his complete lack of training? How are the residents of Krull aware of other planets when the world is seemingly devoid of science or technology? And why does a place described on the film poster as “a world lightyears beyond your imagination” look so much like the British countryside? Audiences who’d seen “Return of the Jedi” a few months earlier must have felt massively disappointed.

Where did those horses come from?! (Image credit: Columbia Pictures)

Despite its flaws, “Krull” is punctuated by ideas, characters, and moments that linger in the memory. Cyclops Rell (played by “Carry On” regular Bernard Bresslaw) is a genuinely tragic figure, cursed to live with a vision of his own heartbreaking demise. And even with minimal screentime, a pre-“Dune” Francesca Annis turns the enigmatic Widow of the Web into an unexpectedly sympathetic character – and that’s despite a story arc that hinges on the sort of nominative contrivance that would later turn “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice” into a laughing stock.

source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

five × three =