Simulation results from HD 134987 exploratory runs with synthetic data created at future epochs using four variables and real data from Jones et al. (2010). The Pmax uncertainty before the simulations is 410 days. From panel (a) to panel (d) are Pmax uncertainty with respect to: Num, Gap, Cov, and Inst variables, respectively. Raw data are in blue and the best fit model with confidence interval for each variable is in orange. Uncertainty humps and dips present in the (b) panel was due to the fact that sampling at certain future epochs/RV phases are preferred for orbital period uncertainty reduction. — astro-ph.EP
Many potential direct imaging candidates suffer from large orbital period uncertainties, leading to challenges in accurate predictions of future orbital positions and imprecise direct imaging measurements of planetary parameters.
To improve the precision in orbital properties, precursor radial velocity (RV) follow-up observations for selected candidates are essential. This study examines the impact of three variables on the orbital period uncertainties of long-period giant planets: the number of future observations, the temporal gap between past and future data, and the temporal coverage of upcoming observations.
Our simulations indicate that the orbital phases at which future RV observations are acquired play a significant role in reducing period uncertainties. Additionally, observing too frequently within a given time frame adds limited value to the program once a certain number of observations has been achieved. The temporal gap proves to be the most important factor when there is no strict end time to the observing campaign.
However, if a strict end time is set, starting observations earlier yields improved reductions in orbital period uncertainty. These insights offer practical guidance for planning efficient RV follow-up campaigns to maximize the science yield of future space-based direct imaging missions.
Zhexing Li, Stephen R. Kane, Sarah Blunt, Caleb K. Harada
Comments: 23 pages, 9 figures, 3 tables. Accepted for publication in PASP
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
Cite as: arXiv:2509.17169 [astro-ph.EP] (or arXiv:2509.17169v1 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.17169
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Zhexing Li
[v1] Sun, 21 Sep 2025 17:34:47 UTC (1,697 KB)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17169
Astrobiology,