

Hertzsprung–Russell diagram comparing the BGM-simulated stellar population (background) with the subset of Gaia sources (superimposed in red) for which reliable effective temperatures and absolute magnitudes are available. The Gaia sample is restricted to within 1 kpc due to parallax accuracy, and most white dwarfs lack reliable temperature estimates. Utilising the BGM enables consideration of the complete breadth of stellar types captured within the bycatch population, including bright Main Sequence stars and minimal confusion between faint Main Sequence and white dwarfs. — astro-ph.IM
Searches for radio technosignatures place constraints on the prevalence of extraterrestrial transmitters in our Galaxy and beyond. It is important to account for the complete stellar population captured within a radio telescope’s field of view, or stellar ‘bycatch’.
In recent years, catalogues from ESA’s Gaia mission have enabled SETI surveys to place tighter limits on extraterrestrial transmitter statistics. However, Gaia remains restricted by magnitude limits, astrometric uncertainty at large distances, and confusion in crowded regions.
To address these limitations, we investigate the use of the Besançon Galactic Model to simulate the statistical underlying stellar population to derive more realistic constraints on the occurrence of extraterrestrial transmitters. We apply this method to Breakthrough Listen’s Enriquez/Price survey, modelling 6,182,364 stellar objects within 1229 individual pointings and extending the search out to distances ≤25kpc.
We place limits on the prevalence of high duty cycle transmitters within 2.5kpc, suggesting ≤(0.000995±0.000002)% of stellar systems contain such a transmitter (for near-zero drift rates and EIRPmin≳5×1016W). In support of broader adoption, we provide a simple calculator tool that enables other researchers to incorporate this approach into their own SETI analyses.
Our results enable a more complete statistical estimation of the number and stellar type of systems probed, thereby strengthening constraints on technosignature prevalence and guiding the analysis of future SETI efforts. We also conclude that SETI surveys are, in fact, much less biased by anthropocentric assumptions than is often suggested.
Louisa A. Mason, Michael A. Garrett, Andrew P. V. Siemion
Comments: 8 pages, 7 figures
Subjects: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
Cite as: arXiv:2511.20231 [astro-ph.IM] (or arXiv:2511.20231v1 [astro-ph.IM] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.20231
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Louisa Mason
[v1] Tue, 25 Nov 2025 12:03:59 UTC (494 KB)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.20231
Astrobiology, SETI,




